2002


two-towers

Wrapping up where The Fellowship of the Ring left off, The Two Towers continues Peter Jackson’s mammoth Lord of the Rings saga. Released in 2002, The Two Towers was the most critically-acclaimed film of the trilogy according to Rotten Tomatoes. It featured more special effects and more action than its predecessor and picked up the tempo significantly, utilizing the well-laid introduction to spring the continuing story.

To call The Two Towers a sequel would be erroneous. It is simply a continuation of Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy, so it does feel odd to compare the films. I had thought of providing simply one review for the entire trilogy, but decided against it on the basis of it being much too long. It is reasonable to criticize each individual film as a part of a larger whole, of course, and that’s what I shall attempt to do here.

Interestingly, The Two Towers almost didn’t come to be. Miramax had originally planned for the series to be two films, but luckily Jackson and Co. opted to create a trilogy and some script shuffling took place. With some timeline issues, the movie takes some liberties with the story in ways that Fellowship didn’t. The battle at Helm’s Deep becomes the climactic keystone, for instance, and the entire film’s tone builds towards that epic encounter. Other aspects are left for the third movie, while others are left out altogether.

As the motion picture opens, we learn of what happened between Gandalf (Ian McKellen) and the Balrog on the Bridge of Khazad-dûm. It is an impressive way to start the movie and it clearly links it to Fellowship while expanding upon what we’ve already learned. We’re then reintroduced to Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) as they continue their quest to deliver the One Ring to Mount Doom. They are being followed, clearly, and we are soon brought face to face with their stalker, the marvellously-designed Gollum (Andy Serkis).

Frodo and Sam soon get Gollum to serve as a sort of guide, although distrust peppers the relationship. Gollum agrees to lead them to the Black Gate of Mordor, presumably in exchange for proximity to the Ring. Meanwhile, we also catch up with the Uruk-hai and their captives, Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd). They are being tracked by Aragorn (Viggo Mortenson), Legolas (Orlando Bloom), and the dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies). As we learn, the pursuit through Rohan is interrupted by the conflict in the land between King Théoden (Bernard Hill) and his people. Théoden is under the spell of Gríma Wormtongue (Brad Dourif).

The task at hand is to get Théoden out from under Wormtongue’s spell and back to leading his people properly. Rohan has been taken by Orcs and wild men who roam the land and cause destruction, working ever closer towards the ultimate destruction of the race of men. It is up to Théoden to save his people, but he needs the help of Aragorn, Gandalf, and the rest to do so. Meanwhile, Merry and Pippin are safe in the arms of the Ents in Fangorn Forest and must lead them to action against Saruman (Christopher Lee) at Isengard. Frodo and Sam move closer still towards Mount Doom.

There are a few compelling aspects to The Two Towers that really stand out above and beyond the masterful production from Jackson as discussed previously in the Fellowship review. For starters, the creature Gollum is breathtaking and impressive. Animation on Gollum got underway in 1998, as Weta Digital began to hammer it own. Serkis wore a motion capture suit, like he does in King Kong, and effectively played Gollum on screen. It is, as most of the effects in the series, absolutely seamless.

The battle at Helm’s Deep is the elegant core to The Two Towers. It is a massive battle, featuring loads of action and tonnes of effects. It is, quite simply, an absolute joy to watch. Jackson films with energy and style, always delivering the goods. The cutaways to other stories during the main battle are important and surprisingly don’t interrupt the flow. The monstrous and delightful Howard Shore score pumps even more energy into the battle.

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is a blast. It is a fast-moving, exciting, compelling centre to Peter Jackson’s massive undertaking. Obviously a viewing of the Fellowship of the Ring would be necessary before starting The Two Towers, as the picture doesn’t stand on its own at all. Nevertheless, The Two Towers still remains a powerful notation of the magic of modern cinema and its rousing possibilities.

9.5/10

Trailer:

Jim Sheridan’s beautiful In America is a family drama that moves like life moves, pushing and pulling without warning and engaging our emotions whether we want it or not. The 2002 movie is semi-autobiographical, taking events and characters loosely based around the life of the director and his two daughters, Naomi and Kirsten. In fact, the two Sheridan girls helped write the film’s dynamic and spunky screenplay.

As In America begins, we are introduced to a family of Irish immigrants on their way to the United States via a Canadian tourist visa. My wife and I lamented that they should have stayed in Canada. Paddy Considine is Johnny, the father of the family. He is taking his family to New York City with hopes of becoming an actor. With his wife Sarah (Samantha Morton) and his two daughters, Christy (Sarah Bolger) and Ariel (Emma Bolger) in tow, he packs the crew into an apartment in Hell’s Kitchen. The building is occupied by drug dealers and the family is ensconced in poverty from the outset.

There is also a man living in the building known as “the man who screams.” Eventually the family comes to know him as Mateo (Djimon Hounsou) and a relationship develops. The family encounters hardships and struggles with getting over the passing of Frankie, a young son lost to cancer. Johnny and Sarah struggle with the cycles of blame and sadness, moving through life as ghosts. It is only through the vibrancy of their two daughters that they are able to gain some semblance of happiness.

In America is less about the events that occur and the plot progression and more about the characters and how they exist in the world they are in. We learn about Johnny through his interactions with others, through how he deals with his children, through how Ariel looks at him, and through how he discusses things with Mateo. We learn about Sarah in many of the same ways, as she sends her daughters to the ice cream shop so she can “play with daddy,” how she looks at her husband with combinations of love and confusion, and how she exists in her world. Best of all, we learn about the daughters simply by looking into their eyes.

In lesser hands, In America would have slipped headfirst into schlock territory and wouldn’t have recovered. The manipulation would have stained the screen and it would have been a weepy Hollywood melodrama. But in the hands of Jim Sheridan, director of My Left Foot and In the Name of the Father, it is a capable, taut, dramatic family story. It has realism, insight, and compassion for its characters. The two young girls are not plot devices or plants intended to look cute. Instead, they are our eyes and our window into the family.

The performances here are excellent. Hounsou has always been a favourite of mine and he does some of his best work here as Mateo. There is a moment, a confrontation between Mateo and Johnny, that I am sure will stand out in my mind as one of the finest moments in cinema history. When Mateo sputters and spits in response to Johnny’s accusation, it is remarkable. He says: “No… I’m in love with you. And I’m in love with your beautiful woman. And I’m in love with your kids. And I’m even in love with your unborn child. I’m even in love with your anger! I’m in love with anything that lives!” What a moment!

Any surprises and any shifts in the film come by way of changes in impression. Characters alter their impressions of one another and change how they “see,” instead choosing clarity over fear. The theme of In America regards the overcoming of loss and tragedy as one of the primary human values that we must keep at all costs. But this is also a movie about overcoming fear. Johnny, Sarah, Mateo, Ariel, and Christy all must do it in order to survive life in Hell’s Kitchen. And we must do it too.

10/10

Trailer:

Spider

David Cronenberg delves into the depths of the human psyche in the 2002 psychological thriller Spider. Based on the novel of the same name by Patrick McGrath, Spider premiered at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival and generated some good critical buzz. It faced a limited release in theatres, however, and remained largely unseen by the general public. Despite this, the film was popular among critics and Cronenberg enthusiasts. The performers earned several awards for their work in the film and Cronenberg picked up the Best Director award at the Canadian Genie Awards.

The film struggled with funding from day one. Because of the desire to make the film, Cronenberg deferred his salary and essentially worked for free. Star Ralph Fiennes did the same, along with other members of the cast. For many, Spider was a labour of love and followed the traditional path of indie films during production. For Cronenberg, it was a departure from the science-fiction/horror films he was renowned for and resembled another change in direction. For Fiennes, his love for the project was evident in the way he shopped it around to various directors before ending up with Cronenberg. His knack for the role and his ability to fit the mould is uncanny.

Fiennes stars as Dennis “Spider” Cleg, a man struggling under the weight of eternal torment. When we first meet Cleg, he’s exiting a train in the midst of a throng of people. As Cronenberg outlined on the bonus features of the DVD, Cleg is distinctively set apart in the opening steady- cam shot as he is not caught up with the “normal people” at all. Rather, we see him differently from the outset. He is an odd individual, yet he is never presented with enough distance to make any separations from ourselves. Instead, Cleg is like us in many ways. This adds to the haunting mystique of the film.

Fiennes inhabits the role of Cleg with an evocative quality, living within the skeleton of a man with nothing left. He mutters to himself constantly and picks up stray pieces from the sidewalk as he makes his way to a solemn boarding house in a district of what appears to be somewhere around London. In the boarding house, Cleg is taken in by the gruff landlady (Lynn Redgrave) and is taken to his room. We learn that he is, in fact, in a halfway house and that he has just been released from a mental institution. As his character unravels and we learn more about “Spider,” we also learn more about his past.

Miranda Richardson, who also worked for free on the project, is Cleg’s mother/stepmother/alternate version of the landlady. She arrives as an inhabitant in Cleg’s imagination and in his version of reality. As he attempts to unravel the events of his childhood, he begins to learn and unlearn the truth all at once. When Cleg envisions his father (Gabriel Byrne), he puts together a puzzle of a terrible man responsible for the death of his mother. While the truth is different from Cleg’s version, we learn that his tendency to develop archetypes in his mind is the driving force behind his internal mythology. There is nothing in Cleg’s life that is known for sure and that uncertainty becomes the only certainty in Cronenberg’s interesting film.

For those accustomed to Cronenberg, this will be a treat. It is a different speed from many of his movies and it inhabits the usual territory with a bit of a different spin. The “enemy” is once again the mind, but this time the hallucinations are incredibly natural and believable. We find Cleg’s version of the truth to be eerie but believable, which provides ultimate sympathy to “Spider” before the truth sets us free of the confines of his flawed narrative. Cronenberg unfolds this beautifully, using everything from Howard Shore’s haunting score to the emptiness of London streets to manipulate this portrait of a man lost in the recesses of his own mind.

Spider is a haunting piece, doubtlessly, and it may prove to be more distancing and abandoning than many films. There is little to connect with here and most of Cronenberg’s movie feels like an exercise in observation, as though the events are occurring in a giant fishbowl. There is a purpose to this approach, however, and most of Spider is highly effective as a disturbing glance into the mind of Cleg. Fiennes is terrific in the role, too, and proves that his acting ability is right up there with the true greats of our time. Miranda Richardson steals the show, however, with her triple play performance. She is truly great.

Overall, Spider is worth seeing for fans of Cronenberg’s work. It is a truly disturbing little movie, one that unfolds slowly and with purpose. Everything about it is well done, yet there is something lacking in the big picture that leaves the final product oddly forgettable. Fiennes, Richardson, and the rest of the cast are all on point and Cronenberg’s direction is technically flawless. Spider is still a good film, but it lacks some of what makes Cronenberg’s other films so uniquely grand.

7/10

Attack of the Clones

2002 saw the release of the next prequel of Lucas’s magical Star Wars space opera, Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones. This film is a rousing spectacle that increases the elements of the first film and serves to brightly set up the elements in the upcoming film, capturing middle ground in a fascinating and exciting way. Lucas’s Attack of the Clones is probably the least well-liked of the series from a critical standpoint, but I disagree. The movie is stronger than The Phantom Menace and more is at stake at the very heart of it all.

Strong themes of rebellion fill Attack of the Clones with a very different energy, making George Lucas’s piece a sequel that capitalizes on the original without repeating the original. The film is set ten years after the events in The Phantom Menace, as we find the galaxy on the brink of civil war. Thousands of solar systems want to secede from the Galactic Republic and assassination attempts are regularly made on Senator Amidala (Natalie Portman), the former Queen of Naboo. The separatist movement, led by former Jedi Master Count Dooku (Christopher Lee) aims to take out all opposition. Amidala is pushing against the creation of a special Army of the Republic, so her opposition has interests in taking her life.

Two Jedi Knights are assigned to her security. Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) and Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) head to Coruscant after Amidala was nearly assassinated. They begin pursuit of her would-be assassins, only to uncover a much deeper plot involving a clone army designed for the Republic. Anakin is to protect Amidala, while Obi-Wan heads to a mysterious planet to investigate the creation of this clone army. Anakin struggles with constantly being told what to do and, feeling he is more than ready to be a Jedi Knight, begins to make some serious errors in judgment as he rebels against Obi-Wan’s leadership.

Attack of the Clones develops Anakin’s character to a greater degree, as we see tinges of arrogance and a lack of impulse control. Perhaps Master Yoda was right in The Phantom Menace when he said that there was too much fear in the boy. As Anakin heads back to Tatooine and makes a critical decision, we learn more about him and his anger. Anakin’s difficulty in terms of controlling his emotions becomes a central plot point with Attack of the Clones, making it a very interesting movie. We also see the construction of the Dark Side and their intentions become clearer. Things are building towards something as the Force is twisted and strange ironies lead to muted victories for the Jedi Knights.

Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones was the first Star Wars film to be internationally out-grossed at the box office during the year of its original release. It was also considered by critics, of course, to be not “on par” with the original films. I tend to have different standards and tend to have a less cynical outlook than the average critic, however, and I enjoyed this one a great deal. Once again, there were rousing battle sequences and exciting moments of action and suspense. Some of the series’ most jaw-dropping effects take place in Attack of the Clones and the final battle sequence is incredible.

Lucas’s Attack of the Clones, like The Phantom Menace, furthered technological development in the world of film. As I watch modern “effects movies,” I am still hard-pressed to find films that look as good and as seamless as Attack of the Clones or The Phantom Menace. Lucas’s nose for effects and visualization is second to none in Hollywood or anywhere else. Attack of the Clones helped move Hollywood into the digital age with the use of a digital camera using an HD digital 24 frame system. It simply looks stunning and the stirring battle sequences are all the more intense because of Lucas’s inventive direction and willingness to try new things in the world of film technology. Attack of the Clones has the distinction of being the second film in history to be shot entirely on a digital camera, with the first being 2001’s Pitof-directed Vidocq.

The romantic interludes between Amidala and Anakin are ripped right out of classic romance films, complete with frolicking in fields and secret weddings. These ideas are nothing new to film, of course, and the dialogue that the two share is akin to similar moments suiting a space opera saga. For there to be a deep romance between the characters, complete with witty natural romantic comedy-style dialogue, would undermine Lucas’s intention. The characterizations have depth in other ways and Anakin’s descent into the Dark Side remains the film’s focal point and its strength.

Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones sounds and looks incredible. With surround sound and widescreen treatment, it is still one of the most exciting films of the 2000s and feels intense. The rousing John Williams score, complete with “Dark Side teasers” throughout, immensely accompanies the action and some of the film’s more understated scenes. Attack of the Clones might be the lowest-performing Star Wars film at the box office, but it is still a spectacle worth seeing and a worthy inclusion in the world’s most exciting space opera.

9/10

Trailer:

Secretary

2002’s Secretary is an entertaining black comedy that displays an unconventional relationship with candour, splendour, and incongruity all at once. It is a quirky film and I didn’t find it quite as dark as some others, but the overall experience provided by director Steven Shainberg was quite enjoyable. Shainberg’s picture walks a fine line, taking concepts of sadomasochism and treating them with a rather light, airy brush. The strength of the film lies in its characters and how they come to rely on one another, at first with trepidation and eventually with reckless abandon.

Secretary stars Maggie Gyllenhaal as Lee Halloway, the emotionally sensitive and shy daughter in a family of domineering and dysfunctional personalities. Her character is quickly established through a few quick scenes which cautiously demonstrate her coping mechanisms. We learn that Lee has just returned from a psychiatric hospital where she was placed for cutting herself purposefully. As Lee returns home, we learn that Lee’s family has little idea as to how to treat the young woman and instead simply forces her into the norm. Lee takes a course on typing, eager to enter into “normal society,” and begins the search for a job.

James Spader is tightly wound attorney Edward Grey. Grey hires Lee instantly during a very odd interview sequence. Grey takes to Lee instantly, but begins to tinker with a domineering personality to push her limitations. He notices that she cuts herself, so he tells her to stop immediately and invokes his own control in her life. This relationship ascends (or descends, depending on your outlook) into the territory of BDSM as both characters awaken to the freedom that their newfound relationship brings. Lee and Grey deal with their feelings different. Lee becomes more smitten with Grey, whereas Grey is unsure as to how to deal with his emotional attachment to Lee and to the world of BDSM. The remainder of the film deals with this dilemma as we watch the characters develop with frankness and sincerity.

Where Secretary succeeds is in making its characters real and not merely objects of fun or dismay. We understand why Lee cuts herself to feel alive and to feel included in something larger than herself, even though we might disagree with her methodology. Lee is very much a “good person.” She appears to have solid values, she’s a nice young woman, and she is kind. Lee is so kind that she is submissive, crawling around in a dumpster looking for a discarded piece of work. She becomes so submissive that she begins to manipulate the relationship with Grey in order to get more dominance from him, intentionally making errors to receive a scolding or a spanking. Lee’s desires are clear, whereas Grey’s are often clouded by his obsessive personality.

The relationship functions because Lee gets to feel a sense of belonging and a sense of function. Grey “needs” her in some fashion, so she springs up when called to his office and does whatever is asked of her. Grey notices her, plays games with her, and thinks about her. He even tells her what to eat, going so far as to tell her to consume a mere “four peas” during a comical segment involving a family meal. Grey is clinging to some sort of sanity, however, but we see that he is losing control of his life. His clients begin to notice, his practice suffers as a result, and he creates “busy work” out of arranging things and tinkering with plants and flowers.

Secretary is a film about healing and deliverance. The characters find what they need in one another and they can’t get it anywhere else. They do what works for them. Lee and Edward Grey have a good thing going and Shainberg’s film celebrates that. It is a truly tender film, one that may seem disconcerting because of the subject matter, but one that very hurriedly sheds light on the true nature of the characters by lightly playing at the nature of BDSM. There are no broad strokes here, but instead everything is rather understated and contained by the casings of these characters. Their fractured souls are within and we begin to gain understanding as to why these people do what they do and why it makes them feel so good.

The performances are brilliant, with Gyllenhaal doing an outstanding job and coming across as amiable as ever. She is incandescent in many scenes, seeming almost too innocent for the subject matter. That virtuousness, however, is what makes Secretary all the more effectual and concise. Spader is the perfect counterpart, sweating through his performance with an infatuated attention to detail. He is a fine actor and Secretary may well be his best film performance. The chemistry between Spader and Gyllenhaal is marvellous, too, as both performers know how to communicate a lot with very little.

Secretary is an audacious film, but it is not an odious one. It is eccentric, but not creepy. It is kind-hearted, but not sappy. Shainberg’s film creates an embroidery of character and aroma, leaving the audience the responsibility of falling in love with these characters or wholly rejecting them out of strained ignorance. Many will champion the characters for what they do, but I’d rather champion these characters for who they are and what they discover. Secretary is not about BDSM; it’s about people needing each other.

8/10

The Sea is Watching

Director Kei Kumai died in May of 2007 from a cerebral hemorrhage. The last film he directed was The Sea is Watching, a film written by the master Akira Kurosawa and based on a novel by Shugoro Yamamoto. The Sea is Watching, or The Sea Was Watching from the literal translation, was released in Japan in June of 2002 and is a sweeping epic melodrama. It features performances by Misa Shimizu, Nagiko Tono, Masatoshi Nagase, and Hidetaka Yoshioka.

The film takes place in the 19th century. It follows the story of Oshin (Tono), who is a prostitute in a brothel in a sort of “red-light district” in a village. Many people assume Oshin and her friends are geishas, but they are not. Instead, Oshin lives a very unfortunate existence and yet has the power to rise above many of the shortcomings of her life to enjoy a rather happy existence with her friends and with her various customers. Oshin is known for falling in love with her customers, rather frequently, and The Sea is Watching zeros in on two of these “love” relationships in particular to highlight the giving and kind nature of Oshin, even in cases when such love is not returned.

Oshin would best be described in modern terms as being horribly naive, yet she is relatively comfortable in the roller-coaster that her life appears to take. She gives herself frenetically to her customers, often offering up money or security to those she falls in love with and having little regard for the safety of herself as a result. Oshin, when we first meet her, is shielding a young samurai (Yoshioka) who has been disgraced as the result of a drunken fight. She shields him from his pursuers and helps him regain his footing in society, falling in love with him along the way. One night, the samurai tells Oshin that she can regain her purity by not taking on any further customers. The other prostitutes at the brothel, including the mistrusting but mothering Kikuno (Shimizu) help Oshin by working her customers for her and giving her the money. This display of generosity highlights the friendships these girls have.

Without saying how, the situation deteriorates for Oshin and she finds herself back to basics and taking on customers again. Broken-hearted, Oshin begins a relationship with a desperate and suicidal man, Ryosuke (Nagase). This relationship is represented by the fact that it appears to be rather co-dependent. Ryosuke represents a sort of loose cannon type character to Oshin, while Oshin represents stability to Ryosuke and gives him something to live for. The relationship continues on and, meanwhile, Kikuno enters into troubles of her own with an older abusive customer. This entanglement is pressured further by the looming storm and everything is thrust into further chaos. The Sea is Watching illustrates the chaotic nature of life through the storm as the film draws to a close, forcing hard choices out of each character.

The Sea is Watching is a very vibrant film, captured with lots of colour and through eloquent, patient direction from Kei Kumai. It would have been interesting to see how Kurosawa would have directed this project, as his components are virtually all over this picture. Kurosawa made special points in The Sea is Watching to involve women as the heroines here and to create a special relationship between these characters. Most of the men in the film are rather despicable and deplorable, making for an interesting dichotomy as the women in the brothel fend for themselves and battle the elements with love and resolve for one another.

The film also features some good performances, especially that of Misa Shimizu, the actress playing the role of Kikuno. She plays Kikuno as a broken but alive woman with lots of life experience and lots of unanswered questions. As she is abused by an older customer and wooed by another, it becomes clear that Kikuno often struggles against herself in terms of finding a will to combat what is obviously poor treatment. She, like others, appears to not know what to do in the face of the abuse and does not reach for help. Instead, Kikuno simply endures it, like she endures the storm and the rising waters. Shimizu plays her with a tender toughness, as she uses her personal experiences to ensure that Oshin doesn’t make the same mistakes but yet seems unclear as to how to free herself. This makes for some tender moments, especially towards the conclusion of the film.

The Sea is Watching is a film about the women of the brothel. It contains a meandering storyline and the events that occur as plot devices, while often distracting, are not the central components to Kumai’s film. Instead, this is Kurosawa’s tender vision of women and heroism in a different form. The film also features a lot of style and elegance from the characters, making it a beautiful film to look at for various reasons. The performances are good overall, with a few rough patches involving some of the supporting characters. Overall, however, The Sea is Watching is a gentle meditation on troubled women and the suffering that takes place in order to overcome the odds of a less fortunate life.

8/10

28 Days Later

Danny Boyle’s intelligent film, 28 Days Later, is not really the zombie slasher film that it was sent up as. Instead, it’s an articulate film about survival and humanity told through the relationships of the characters and the situations they find themselves in. The virus plot is simply a backdrop for Boyle’s profound exploration of what human beings would do in such a desolate and desperate situation. 28 Days Later, sadly, degrades itself to conventional plot holes and storyline gaffes in the closing half and doesn’t quite recuperate the maddening glory of the first portion of the film. Nonetheless, it is a credible film and well worth a look.

28 Days Later is a 2002 British post-apocalyptic horror science fiction film, by any rights of definition. It is set in Great Britain and depicts the accidental release of a contagious virus on the people. Boyle’s film sheds light on the subsequent breakdown of society as a result of this viral infection, as people turn to animals and struggle to suit their instincts. We are never told of a direct motivation for the infected people in 28 Days Later, just that they appear to run in packs and, for some reason, do not seem to attack other infected individuals. The infection spreads through the bloodline and takes approximately twenty seconds to take over the body of a human being, making time of the essence.

Cillian Murphy stars as Jim, a bicycle courier. He awakens in a hospital and quickly finds the world around him to appear “empty.” In a variety of stunning and lavish shots, we are shown the world as Jim sees it. London’s streets are bare, devoid of any human presence, and the utter desolation is setting in. Jim calls out for someone, anyone, but finds no answer. As he travels through the barren streets, he comes in contact with a pair of survivors and plans are set in motion to get through this situation in one piece. Jim and Selena (Naomie Harris), one of the survivors, eventually find a father (Brendan Gleeson) and his teenage daughter (Megan Burns) and attempt to get through the storm together. This leads to several situations of maddening intensity, many of which are sadly downgraded through the use of action film lookalike sequences.

Nonetheless, 28 Days Later remains a powerful film for many reasons. The first of these reasons is the sheer look of the desolation gripping Great Britain. Boyle shot the majority of the film on digital video, giving the film a clear and crisp look. The streets of London were partially blocked off to shoot several of the deserted sequences, so the smaller digital camera made shooting in such a brief window of time more efficient. Much of the film was shot quickly and with great efficiency by Boyle and his crew, including the scene in which the double-decker bus is shown tipped on its side. The crew tipped the bus, cameras got rolling, and Murphy moved past the tipped bus. The scene was shot entirely in about twenty or so minutes. This type of efficiency and attention to detail to capture as much realism as possible helps create a truly gritty and concise feel for the film.

Another reason the film works is because of the characters. Murphy is great as Jim, capturing his able desperation and panic without overdoing anything. He attempts to give Jim a somewhat staggered sense of optimism, allowing him to glance at the horizon without losing the innate fear of the situation as a whole. This crafts a really engaging character out of Jim and keeps the story humming along nicely. Harris is equally compelling as Selena, the tough-as-nails woman who will waste an “infected” within seconds, no questions asked. Her harsh stance on life reflects the notions of a realist, yet as the events continue and as Selena herself evolves, she learns new things about life and begins to adapt her feelings to her fragile surroundings. Harris, like Murphy, never presses too much.

28 Days Later does falter near the conclusion of the film, denigrating into typical action fodder, which is disappointing given the careful build throughout the film. The military sequences and the additional characters seemed, to me, to provide the film with overcrowding and too much sustenance, when the “less is more” approach would have been more consistent with Boyle’s introductions to the piece and to the characters. So instead of cataloging a powerful thriller with bite, Boyle’s 28 Days Later heads down familiar genre territory and self-destructs. It’s too bad, really, because the quality of filmmaking and performances in the film deserved a better ending.

Nonetheless, 28 Days Later is an enjoyable little creeper of a film. It’s gritty, nice to look at, and has engaging characters that develop nicely over time. Boyle’s film is a partial change from the genre classics, but doesn’t revolutionize the whole way and abandons ship halfway through, giving way to shallow conventions and atypical role-playing.

6/10

Trailer:

Spellbound

Spellbound is top-notch entertainment and a documentary that is as exciting and compelling as ever thought possible given the subject matter. Sure, spelling bees have probably represented more popularity on ESPN than NHL hockey – yeah, that stings – but a documentary about eight kids taking part in the National Spelling Bee can’t be all that exciting, can it? Oh yeah. It can be.

Spellbound was directed by Jeffrey Blitz and was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. This would be Blitz’s directorial debut and it’s a great film for this director, who also went on to direct 2007’s Rocket Science. Blitz follows eight competitors in the 1999 Scripps National Spelling Bee and delves into their personal lives, creating a compelling narrative that allows the audience to simultaneously cheer for the whole group and pick a favourite to win. Of course, avid spelling bee watchers would doubtless already know the “winner” here, but for those not in the know, Spellbound would prove an even more exciting prospect.

The kids are tremendous, there’s no doubt about that at all. From the peculiar and goofy to the studious and serious, Spellbound covers the gamut of childhood within competition with a grace and care that is not often seen in similar films. Like the beautiful Mad Hot Ballroom, this film allows the characters within the real lives of the children to speak for themselves and does without a standard narrative or a guiding light. Instead, we are introduced to each of the eight contestants we’ll follow within the opening half of the film. This introduction to the kids takes us on a wild ride around the United States, from the less privileged areas of D.C. to an affluent area in California, to a standard farm and into suburbia.

The real key within Spellbound is the identifiable factors behind each of the kids. It’s easy to feel compelled when the kids are so varied and so intelligently and innocently presented by Blitz. Nothing is forced here, so the organic nature of the kids in their natural and not-so-natural environments is on display without a filter. Kids claim to not want to be at the spelling bee, others claim indifference, and still others have intense competitive fire to win the whole thing. The desire and true nature of the spellers is part of the reason that the film works so well. You can’t write stuff this good!

Spellbound is also insanely riveting. I found myself standing and cheering or swatting at my screen as though I was watching a Vancouver Canucks game. It was truly an experience of a film that allows for cheering and booing, both at the victories and the apparent injustices (”he pronounced it wrong!”) that occur. Spellbound is probably one of the most action-packed thrillrides there is, actually, and contains so much raw energy and fire that it’s hard to turn away. It is a film that will fascinate, compel, excite, and interest almost anyone with its natural style and its heart.

9/10

Infernal Affairs

Infernal Affairs is a 2002 Hong Kong crime thriller that saw its North American release in 2004. The film’s Chinese title is Wú Jiān Dào, which refers to Avici or “The Non-Stop Way” which is the lowest level of hell in Buddhism. The English title, Infernal Affairs, is often related to a play on words of the “internal affairs” concept and Dante’s Inferno. All meaningless title discussion aside, Infernal Affairs is a hell of a film.

Most people know that Scorsese’s The Departed – coincidentally (or not) reviewed below – is effectively a remake of Infernal Affairs. Infernal Affairs has received a lot of acclaim for its star-studded cast and its original plot. It also did really well in Hong Kong and was heralded as reviving Hong Kong cinema. Infernal Affairs would be followed by a prequel, Infernal Affairs II, and a sequel, Infernal Affairs III, both of which were released in 2003.

The film stars Tony Leung (Hero, 2046) as a cop, Chan Wing Yan, who goes deep undercover into the Triad. Andy Lau (House of Flying Daggers, Needing You) stars as Lau Kin Ming, a Triad member that has infiltrated the police department. Each mole had been planted by the rival organization to gain an intelligence advantage over the other side, so a chess match begins as a result of the dueling moles. As Yan and Ming become more engrossed with their covers, they become more involved in the ideologies of the double lives they lead, which sets up certain complications.

The film also stars Eric Tsang (Cop on a Mission, Partners) as Hon Sam, the Triad boss, Anthony Wong (The Painted Veil, Give Me a Chance) as Superintendent Wong, the police captain in charge of the investigation, Kelly Chen (Vampire Hunter D, Tokyo Raiders) as Dr. Lee Sum Yee, a psychiatrist that tries to help Yan, Sammi Cheng (Fighting for Love, My Left Eye Sees Ghosts) as Mary, the love interest to Ming, and pop singer Elva Hsiao as May. As you can see, Infernal Affairs has a lot of characters.

The characters drive the story and the dialogue tells the tale, for the most part. The violence is kept to a minimum and most of it is off-screen save for a few instances. Instead, Infernal Affairs is primarily a psychological crime thriller that uses music and camera work very effectively to describe the action and to set the scene. Directors Andrew Lau and Alan Mak do a tremendous job of setting this one up, allowing each scene to unfold organically and naturally. They have a great cast to work with, as evidenced, and they make the most out of their opportunity to turn out one hell of a crackling good yarn.

Infernal Affairs is tremendously smart from start to finish. It is a film that takes its audience seriously and allows the viewers to discern the plot as it unfolds, not taking anything for granted. The flashbacks do ruin a bit of the mystique on one hand, but on the other hand they serve to give us insight into what the characters are thinking and how they are reacting. The stoicism of the characters, for the most part, belie a quiet responsibility to their respective jobs and to their respective passions. As the characters of Yan and Ming are engaged in their respective lifestyles and are deep undercover, their aspirations and goals appear to fall by the wayside and their lives are put on hold. While the relatively short runtime allows for a reasonable depth into the motivations behind the characters, it seems that Infernal Affairs relies on its prequel to further bring out the hidden passions of these beautiful characters.

The film is also shot exceptionally well, as the cinematography is second to none here. Scenes unwind beautifully, like a true art-house film, and the camera serves as both a guide and as a passive observer. The direction tenderly allows the performers to take very good care of the eloquent story and the elaborate characters by illuminating much of the process with different shot techniques and cool cutaways or flashbacks.

For Infernal Affairs to put Hong Kong back on the map when it comes to filmmaking is a great thing. I look forward to watching the other films within this story arc, as the characters and expert storytelling offer tremendous excitement and really do justice to the care in which this film was made. It truly is a wonderful piece of filmmaking that can be enjoyed by lovers of cinema. (For those looking for me to compare this directly to The Departed, sorry to let you down).

8.5/10

Trailer:

Hollywood Ending

It’s no secret that I’m a big fan of Woody Allen. I find him one of the most consistent filmmakers of our time and one of the funniest men of all time. Allen’s wit and mind for comedy is surely one of a kind. Allen’s offbeat look at Hollywood gets mashed together with a funny story about a director suddenly going blind in Hollywood Ending, the 2002 comedy. The film didn’t do well in America and was perceived as a relative flop, but much like the ending in the film, it received a good deal of success and accolades overseas.

Allen stars in his film and it’s his vintage character. He plays a neurotic and insistently nervous film director, Val Waxman, that has had moments of past brilliance but has since faded into relative obscurity. We first find Waxman directing a commercial in snowy Canada (ha ha) and pining that he has one two Oscars and is now reduced to this. Meanwhile, Waxman’s ex-wife, Ellie (Tea Leoni), is working to try to give Waxman another chance at making a hit. Ellie thinks that Val is the perfect choice to direct a film that she wrote, so she tries to convince her Hollywood bigshot boyfriend (Treat Williams) to enlist Waxman. Eventually Waxman is hired on to direct, but the pressures of directing and being in this tricky situation working with his ex-wife and for her new boyfriend get to him and he develops psycho-somatic blindness right before shooting.

Waxman calls his agent (Mark Rydell) and tells him about this disturbing new development and the pair decide that there’s no way that Waxman can tell anyone about his blindness or it’ll ruin his big chance at a comeback. A plan is decided upon for Val to work the film blind as a bat and, with the help of the translator of his cinematographer, Waxman sets out to work on the film. Of course, the running gag here is that Waxman doesn’t look all that out of place making the film blind and his neurotic behavior actually serves as a subterfuge. Sure, the cast and crew think he’s a bit goofy to work for and question some of his decisions as a director, but overall they have faith in the final product and continue to do what he wants. Waxman’s film that he creates while blind still winds up getting completed and pieced together.

The film contains many of the typical Hollywood pratfalls that many “insider” films include. Waxman’s younger girlfriend, played by Debra Messing, is an aspiring actress who can’t act. She is, however, given a part in the film by Waxman and nobody questions his logic because of his status as an “auteur”. The running gag in the film is essentially that many Hollywood productions could actually be helmed by a blind director and many of the crew and performers around would hardly know the difference. This gag, coupled with the backstory of Ellie and Val’s past relationship, make the film quite entertaining although nowhere near the top level of many of Allen’s other wonderful films.

Hollywood Ending is peppered with the usual array of classic one-liners and quite a bit of funny physical comedy, making it entertaining enough to pass the time. Nothing in the film resonates for long enough, however, making it instantly forgettable for the most part. Hollywood Ending is still miles better than most other comedic films out there and is a great looking film with wonderful cinematography and great vision. The acting is good, too, from top to bottom. Unfortunately, there is something lacking to the cohesive nature of the film that causes it to lose ground as it proceeds. It is almost as though the film is slightly to crowded and that Allen decided to pile more on top of more, leaving the film somewhat overcrowded and blurry.

The film steers clear of a lot of the typical Hollywood entities and is free of foul language and crude humour, making it an accessible comedy for most audiences. It is still largely adult, of course, because of its wit and humour. Never one to take his audience for a fool, Allen mindfully makes his films so as to not alienate his audience. Hollywood Ending is no different, yet it lacks the same punch that we’ve come to expect from one of my favourite filmmakers of all time. Nevertheless, an average Woody Allen film is still better than the best of many other filmmakers.

7/10

Next Page »