1999


girl_interrupted

Based on a true story or perhaps countless true stories, Girl, Interrupted is about how a 60s culture dealt with mental illness. We are given access to the story through the eyes of Susanna Kaysen, played in the movie by Winona Ryder. Kaysen’s memoirs of the same name were adapted for the screen by director James Mangold and Lisa Loomer. According to Kaysen, the finished product was a film with too much “melodramatic drivel.”

For the most part, Kaysen is correct. While Girl, Interrupted is well-acted and looks pretty good, it lacks the meandering quality of the memoirs and attempts too rigid a plotline. Instead of perhaps talking about the system of mental health care and how problems were dealt with at the fictional Claymoore Hospital (for Kaysen, the real facility was McLean Hospital), Mangold veers down a path of melodramatic posturing and blows momentum with a problematic third act.

Susanna is 18-years-old. She’s what we could call a typical teenager, except one day she downed a bottle of pills and chased it with a bottle of vodka. Who knows? Maybe that’s still typical teen stuff. Susanna “voluntarily” checks herself in to Claymoore Hospital and meets the supervising nurse (Whoopi Goldberg) upon arrival. She’s whisked into an almost magical world of various patients suffering with various conditions. They’re all jammed on to the same basic floor in the hospital, regardless of the severity of the condition.

There’s burn victim Polly (Elisabeth Moss), pathological liar Georgina Tuskin (Clea DuVall), the abused and self-abusive Daisy Randone (Brittany Murphy), anorexic Janet Webber (Angela Bettis), lesbian Cynthia (Jillian Armenante), and some others. The “leader of the pack,” so to speak, is a wild sociopath named Lisa Rowe (Angelina Jolie). As Susanna gets to know the various people in the hospital, she starts to make friends and realizes something she never had in the “outside world.” The cost of these friends turns out to be more significant than she ever thought possible.

Kaysen’s memoirs detail what is described as two years of life lost. She is now a “recovered borderline personality,” apparently, so perhaps those years weren’t lost after all. The events of her life are shrouded in some ambiguity, as the memoirs reflect, but Mangold’s picture leaves none of that to the imagination. Instead of psychological meanderings, we’re given direct, sharp plot points complete with a runaway trip to visit a released patient and a stupid conclusion in the bowels of the hospital.

But the reason to see Girl, Interrupted really has little to do with whether or not Mangold got Kaysen’s memoirs quite right. The real reason to see this movie has to do with the performances. Frankly, they’re all very good from the top to the bottom of the cast. Goldberg is comforting and amusing as the supervising nurse, while Ryder plays a convincing lead character yet again. Murphy puts forth what is doubtlessly the best performance of her haphazard and perplexing career, too.

It is Angelina Jolie, in her Oscar-winning performance, who really knocks it out of the park though. She’s a loose cannon in every sense of the word, launching herself headfirst into the role of Lisa with a sort of impish, disrespectful abandon. There’s nothing to her and there’s everything to her, all at once, as she’s able to shift gears on a dime and really give her character deep, weighty context. It’s easy to play a crazy person; it’s less easy to make that person relevant and ultimately human.

Overall, however, Mangold simply dropped the ball here. Despite being given the gift of solid performances and a great cast, he fiddles and fusses with the material too much to make much of an impact. There’s too much convolution outside of the hospital and too little concern with why these women are there inside the facility. It’s almost as though they become caricatures only saved by the quality of the performances behind them. As such, Girl, Interrupted is nowhere near as good as it could have been.

4.6/10

Trailer:

The Phantom Menace

In November of 1994, George Lucas began writing the new Star Wars trilogy, a trilogy which would function as background to some of the characters from the original classic Star Wars trilogy. For the first film, Lucas used a 15-page outline that he had written in 1976 and worked it into the full screenplay for what is now known as Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace. With CGI now available and a myriad of possibilities, fans looked forward to the new Star Wars trilogy with anticipation. Lucasfilm developed a $20 million ad campaign to go with it and few films planned their release during the same time period as the new Star Wars movie. Opening night arrived on May 19, 1999, and I, along with several others, arrived to experience Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace.

Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace is a throwback to the original trilogy, that much is clear. The same energy flows through the film and many of the same archetypes are there. From the opening crawl to some of the characterizations, Lucas has generated a film worthy of sitting with the original trilogy. Many fans likely disagree, as many were highly critical of Lucas’s new adventures in the Star Wars universe. In my view, however, it is the fans who got old and not Star Wars. A look at all of the films in order, which is what I will be doing here, reveals that many of the same energies are prevalent in all of the films and the trademark Lucas-isms also exist in force.

The Phantom Menace begins with the opening crawl that all Star Wars fans have come to know and love. We learn that the Trade Federation has blocked the planet of Naboo in hopes of resolving a trade dispute. Chancellor Valorum (Terence Stamp) has dispatched two Jedi Knights, Qui-Gon Jinn (Liam Neeson) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor), to meet with the Trade Federation to hold off the crisis. Once there, the Jedi Knights discover that the Trade Federation is actually working with the mysterious Darth Sidious, who is a Sith Lord. Darth Sidious has ordered the Trade Federation to invade Naboo and kill the two Jedi Knights, which leads to an escape by Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan down to Naboo.

Once on Naboo, the Jedi Knights meet the bone of contention for many Star Wars fans, Gungan Jar Jar Binks (Ahmed Best). Jar Jar takes the Knights to an underwater lair where the rest of the Gungan race lives. Meanwhile, the Trade Federation has taken the Queen of Naboo, Amidala (Natalie Portman). The Jedi Knights team with Jar Jar to rescue the Queen and to fight off the Trade Federation on Naboo. Along the way, Qui-Gon meets young Anakin Skywalker (Jake Lloyd), a nine-year-old human slave with a gift for fixing ships. Qui-Gon spots something extraordinary in the boy and asks for him to be tested for the Force, thinking that Anakin is the “Chosen One” that will bring balance to the Force. To make things more interesting, the mysterious Darth Maul (Ray Park) also tracks the Jedi Knights.

Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace is an exhilarating film experience that hearkens back to Lucas’s original intentions with modern CGI. Lucas was never one who was strong with the script or with directing his performers, so with this opening prequel movie he plays to his strengths with clarity and precision. It isn’t a perfectly directed picture, but Star Wars has never been about the technical details of filmmaking. Instead, Star Wars is about the stories and the universe that is created. With The Phantom Menace, Lucas expands on his beloved universe and begins the process of fleshing out more details of one of its most notorious characters.

The wonder of it all appeared to be lost on many of the fans and critics, but thankfully it wasn’t lost on me or my wife as we revelled in the adventure and excitement of various moments. Characters seemed interesting and the possibilities seemed endless, as Lucas’s space opera trotted on with its legendary score and vast locales. Like Roger Ebert, I echo the sentiment: “How quickly do we become accustomed to wonder.” Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace would have been considered revolutionary had it come out as the first Star Wars movie, but it isn’t and Lucas certainly had his work cut out for him in trying to please an audience that is so rarely satisfied.

One thing to keep in mind about The Phantom Menace is that it is the first story and that this is the framework for the rest of the beast that is the Star Wars saga. Some of the characters are less than compelling, but that’s always the way with these films. We are learning about characters that will become more interesting with the passage of time, as the series itself bears out. We first see Obi-Wan Kenobi, which was interesting enough for me, and learn of the young kid Anakin, which is equally compelling as we already know his fate.

Forgive me, but Star Wars films have always been space operas. Lucas’s intention was to create space operas and the series, despite having taken on a life of their own through fans of the galaxy and the world, has always intended to utilize the normal trappings of the space saga much in the way Buck Rogers did. The intention of Star Wars is to be fun, exciting, colourful, and inventive. Lucas’s use of CGI here accomplishes all of those intentions, in my view, and he has created a solid entry to serve as a beginning to his space opera. The Star Wars saga is richer because of The Phantom Menace, as every good story needs a beginning.

While Kubrick gives us man humbled by the universe in his films about space, Lucas gives us a domesticated universe inhabited by man. Man makes the universe work for him in the Star Wars films and The Phantom Menace is no different. Individuals and groups have very “human problems” and conflicts in the universe, giving way to trade embargoes and all sorts of other stuff of legend. We learn more through Lucas’s storytelling ability, which is engaging in its own right. He tells a good yarn here, as we go from the pod race to the flashy space battle, and we never lose sight of the big picture. Lucas keeps his Star Wars universe intact, is faithful to the “originals,” and leaves us wanting more. Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace raises the curtain on a sense of discovery that is still fascinating and still exhilarating. It’s a hell of a good time at the movies.

9/10

Trailer:

Sleepy Hollow

1999’s Sleepy Hollow is somewhat of a historical horror film, directed by Tim Burton. It is based on an interpretation of the legend of the Headless Horseman and is also based loosely around the Washington Irving story The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. The film stars Johnny Depp and Christina Ricci and contains many of the typical Burton qualities, including dark photography, eerie music and interesting visuals.

Sleepy Hollow follows the story of young constable Ichabod Crane (Depp) as he is sent from New York City to the settlement of Sleepy Hollow in order to investigate a number of slayings. The killings are all rather ghoulish and the similarities between them include the decapitation of the victims. The townspeople tell Crane that they believe a headless ghost is responsible for the killings, but Ichabod is skeptical. Crane begins to learn more about the killings and various supernatural events begin to occur, leaving him no choice but to believe in the legend of the Headless Horseman.

Burton shot Sleepy Hollow using a blue filter, creating a certain mood that worked throughout the picture to add a darker tone. There were a number of elements to the film that Burton fought for, including the killing of the entire Killian family. Elements like this made Sleepy Hollow a very eerie and dark picture while still preserving a comic element, creating a feel that was akin to a graphic novel. The atmosphere and the visuals are very creepy and odd, representing a film style that is straight-up Burton. Watching the film again, I’m not sure anybody else could have contained and presented the subject matter in a more effective and entertaining way.

Sleepy Hollow is, perhaps, Burton’s best looking film. The trees are moody and dark, the characters are rich, and the backdrops to the scenes are eerie and frightening in and of themselves. The film is so drenched in its blue-based doom that one doesn’t even really need any headless ghouls to make it scary. Danny Elfman, one of Burton’s accomplices, adds exquisite tone to Sleepy Hollow with his haunting and engaging score. The score is heavily reliant on the low end of the orchestra here, creating sound that is almost oppressively dark and dreary. Elfman’s score and Burton’s visuals add up to create an environment here, not just a simple film.

Unfortunately, some of the other elements were lacking. The story, for example, contains very little forward momentum and tends to drag at times. Thankfully, Sleepy Hollow is more or less an exercise in mood than it is a blazingly entertaining yarn. Depp and Ricci are reasonably good enough, but this is really the Tim Burton Show. It is dark, comic, evil and tense all rolled into one moody spectacle for the ears and the eyes. It’s just the brain that needs to be shut down for 105 minutes.

7/10

Trailer: