1990


Akira Kurosawa’s beautifully lyrical and spectacular Dreams is based more on imagery than dialogue, but it still contains an incredible amount of broad ideas and striking poetry. The film consists of several dreams experienced by Kurosawa throughout his lifetime. The broader truth contained in the dreams he brings to life reveals the heart of the legendary filmmaker and shows an imagination that is unrivalled, even among the true film greats.

Dreams is not a film that can simply be dissected and partitioned into various categories. It is a deeply profound set of visions, some puzzling and some magical, that comprise a free form journey through the mind of Kurosawa. It is interesting to note that Dreams was released in 1990, amid a storm of Hollywood actioners and fart jokes that would likely sweep right over the beautiful poetry of the master without many taking notice. But Kurosawa, ever defiant, wouldn’t simply make a movie to fall in line. He was eighty years old at the time he decided to reveal his innermost thoughts to the world.

The cast of Dreams is not overly important, as this is not a film about acting or admiring performances. It is a film about art and imagination. Kurosawa utilizes free form filmmaking here, telling his story segments without much rhyme or reason. Often considered a parade of images, Dreams is a tapestry of metaphors, puzzles, and delightful games. The trickery of Kurosawa’s mind manifests itself in the fox weddings and snow blizzards in the film, making for a wonderful treat for the patient, thoughtful filmgoer.

A scene by scene exposition doesn’t do this film justice. It simply must be experienced as a whole, taking in by a dreamer, and processed through a vigorous imagination. Cohesion is not important, nor is precision. Instead, Kurosawa’s window to the soul is all about the meandering soul of filmmaking. For many, this approach will be boring and tedious. For Kurosawa’s fans, however, this is a necessary element to appreciating the master and his career. It is almost a pilgrimage.

The direction is, of course, beautiful and steeped in colour and majesty. There are moments, such as when the nuclear explosion brings down Mount Fuji, that show a greater purpose. Indeed, Kurosawa’s gorgeous filmmaking is focused on nature and on our betrayal of it. He, wiser than us, saw the world in ruins as we now debate reality. Kurosawa’s attention to natural law, natural order, and the wilderness is something we should be envious of, something we should learn from. There is no confliction when it comes to his descriptions of nature, the beasts of the world, and what we must do.

Kurosawa’s Dreams deserve to be examined, pulled apart, and experienced by trained eyes. It’s no coincidence that the likes of George Lucas and Steven Spielberg would admire the man. And it’s no accident that Martin Scorsese stars in Dreams as Vincent Van Gogh. This isn’t simply art for art’s sake. It is so much more. It is, quite literally, what it feels like to dream out loud.

9/10

Reversal of Fortune

1990’s Reversal of Fortune is a chilling little mystery about arguing the facts and arguing the truth. It is about finding the truth, if there is any, between the biased testimonies of the parties involved and weeding through the nonsense and ego to find some reality. In the end, Reversal of Fortune leaves the audience to make up their own minds and to come to their own conclusions.

Directed by Iranian-born Barbet Schroeder (Single White Female, Kiss of Death), Reversal of Fortune is essentially a black comedy-drama. Based on the book by Alan Dershowitz, the film takes us through the true life story of Sunny von Bulow and the attempted murder trial of her husband, Claus von Bulow.

Claus von Bulow is played to sweet, snide perfection by the icy Jeremy Irons. Irons, in a Best Actor-winning performance, brings such calculating energy to von Bulow that the audience finds themselves wishing him to be guilty because he just looks and sounds so guilty. The facts, however, appear to say something different…if indeed we are ever given the facts. The beauty of Irons’ performance is that he appears to inhabit Claus von Bulow and fill him with steely sarcasm and smooth resolve. He is so cold that it becomes difficult to believe his version of the events involving his wife, Sunny. It also becomes difficult to imagine such a seemingly evil presence is totally innocent of, well, anything at all ever.

Sunny von Bulow, played by Glenn Close, tells her story in flashbacks and the film’s narrative. She lays, instead, in a permanent coma while the narrative in her head guides us through her version of the events. It turns out that Sunny, at least according to Claus’ side of the story, may well be just as icy and just as removed as he is. Their marriage is certainly an interesting one, showing a tentative love that began on a rocky foundation and will inevitably end the same way. Infidelity would be the order of the day for the von Bulow marriage and time would tell if it would also be its death knell.

Ron Silver is tremendous as attorney Alan Dershowitz. He brings a classic heroic style to the role, delivering some tremendous lines and sections of dialogue. Dershowitz is given the unenviable task of defending von Bulow in the attempted murder trial. At first, he tentatively asserts that Claus is most likely guilty, but as the story progresses and more factual evidence is revealed, Dershowitz starts to really believe in his client. Whether or not he should is, of course, the entirety of the narrative as it shines in its incompleteness.

The film is deliciously dark and steaming with icy cold sarcasm. Irons is a chilling delight, as is Glenn Close, and Ron Silver somehow ties it all together with the best performance of his career. The direction is compelling as it takes it through the lives of these wealthy and bored socialites, only to leave us with more questions than answers by the time the film ends. Reversal of Fortune wraps up just as it should, however, leaving a little bit of frost on the screen.

8.5/10