1987


Planes_trains_and_automobiles

John Hughes marked a shift away from the teen comedy genre that had been his bread and butter with films like Sixteen Candles and Pretty in Pink when he sat in the director’s chair on 1984’s Planes, Trains and Automobiles. The great thing about Hughes’ pictures is that he always insists on casting human characters. There are no stereotypes, no bland “good-looking” role players to chew the scenery, and no character that remains out of reach. With Planes, Trains and Automobiles, the audience can relate to every single irritating and heart-warming moment.

The match-up looks fantastic in terms of comic excellence: John Candy and Steve Martin. Martin was just coming off of Roxanne, a charming but average romantic comedy that the comedian actually wrote. Candy, meanwhile, was in Mel Brooks’ Spaceballs and was developing a reputation as a bumbling but lovable film idiot. The pairing was genius, with Martin’s wry and witty humour going toe-to-toe against Candy’s softer nature.

Martin is Neal, a sharp and sophisticated Chicago ad man with everything together. He has a lovely home, a great family, and a well-paying job. He wears suits and probably plays golf on weekends, sharply applying the greater interests of his bosses while tossing a chuckle and a wink here and there. Neal is self-confident, too, and knows how he wants to live. One gets the sense that he doesn’t like surprises.

Candy is Del, a travelling salesperson. To say he is a polar opposite of Neal wouldn’t be giving him enough credit. Del is talkative and large. He gleefully imposes his presence on others, saddling up with a laugh or a smile. Del is a treat, but he can be an annoying treat with no awareness of other people’s limits. He is the chatty, portly gentleman that you find saying “Hi!” in the men’s room or talking your ear off on the plane. He is genuine.

Del and Neal happen to be in Manhattan for a few days on business prior to Thanksgiving and both want to get home for the holidays. The trouble begins they find their destinies joined over an innocent mistake involving a taxi in the city (watch for a young Kevin Bacon racing Martin’s character for the cab). Del and Neal wind up in the same airport and miss the same flight, so Del decides that he must make it his personal mission to help Neal get home.

This mission leads down a windy road, to say the least, as Del’s efforts to help Neal wind up hurting him and Thanksgiving at home in Chicago with the family begins to look like it’s not going to happen. Flights are cancelled, cars don’t quite work out as viable transportation, and the train doesn’t do the trick either. Every mode of transportation the title suggests winds up failing these two men, but not as much as they fail one another.

Hughes’ movie could’ve easily taken the lethargic slapstick route and formulated a production about odd couple shenanigans. He could have developed a deep disdain for the two characters, pitting one against the other in the ultimate Thanksgiving battle royal. The beauty is that Hughes didn’t take that path, instead choosing to tell a story about compassion. Neal and Del never give up on one another and they learn what it is like to be in another man’s shoes. Their efforts come from the best of intentions and the film becomes more about what can go wrong, even with those intentions, and less about what these two can do to one another. It is not an antagonistic picture in the least.

Built on this lovable core of empathy is a riotous comedy picture. Planes, Trains and Automobiles features countless moments of pure comedic bliss, including Neal’s symphonic use of the “f-word” and Edie McClurg’s classic response, and a stirring moment of heading the wrong way on the highway in the middle of the night. As a comedy, it still eclipses most modern comedies. But when one considers the core of compassion and character within, too, Planes, Trains and Automobiles becomes a true classic.

9.1/10

Trailer:

Fatal Attraction

I know, I know. I need to have more negative reviews here, but I can’t help it. It certainly is more fun to trash films than it is to praise them, but I’ve been watching a string of great films lately with my wife and it’s been a last to watch such fine and varied cinema. Just wait until my string of Kurosawa, Fellini, Scorsese, etc. reviews come.

Anyway, enough babbling. Fatal Attraction is a stunning psychological thriller backed by great performances and a true sense of escalating tension and fear. The 1987 film is simple enough. It follows a married man (Michael Douglas) who has an affair with a woman (Glenn Close) on a weekend when his wife (Anne Archer) is out of town. The mistake becomes very quickly out of control as the woman’s obsession becomes dangerous and threatening.

Glenn Close plays Alex Forest, an editor from a publishing company. Michael Douglas plays Dan Gallagher, a happily married attorney. The two meet during a weekend when Gallagher’s wife, Beth (Archer), and his daughter are out of town. They have a few physical encounters, but Alex starts to become rather “clingy” to put it lightly. The phone calls start coming at all hours of the night, she starts to threaten him and begins to stalk him. The tension escalates as Alex becomes more bold and more desperate to hold on to Gallagher, despite his unwillingness to continue any sort of relationship with her. Alex eventually goes to extremes and even “kidnaps” the Gallagher’s daughter for an afternoon at the fair.

The key components to the film that make it work wonderfully well are the tension and the actual fear of this situation happening. A married man’s indiscretion is placed under fire here, as Fatal Attraction works as a satisfying cautionary tale to couples everywhere. The film became a highly influential work, providing the blueprint for many crazed stalker films that were based around relationship indiscretion and infidelity. The film’s contextual value is immense, as much of what is shocking in 1987 is still shocking in today’s work and works especially well in the film’s thrilling context. This makes for some legitimate scares and chills, as we relate to both characters and we start to pick sides….right up until the “bunny boiler” scene, of course. Then, all bets are off.

Glenn Close is the real star here. Douglas is great, but he really is second fiddle to Close and her weaving of psychosis through the depth of Alex Forest. Alex is absurd and yet identifiable as the woman scorned. Close plays with depth, timing and escalating insanity as we watch a reasoned approach to losing a love (or a lust) manipulated back and forth between extreme reactions such as self-mutilation to reasoned reactions such as soft sobbing. With the help of director Adrian Lyne (Foxes, Flashdance, Indecent Proposal), Close is able to manipulate the audience through the gamut of emotional responses. We feel sorry for her one minute and we hate her the next.

Many people critique the element of the affair between Forest and Gallagher as being unrealistic, given that Gallagher appears happy with his marriage. This is simply not the case, as Gallagher’s marriage only picks up after the affair is “over”. Gallagher’s plunge into the quick fling is understood and compelled by notions of his being left out of many things, including an evening of supposed sex with his wife when his young daughter ends up in bed with them. It appears that Gallagher’s marriage to Beth has become “normal”, so he seeks out something else. When Gallagher and Forest begin their affair, it is brazen and risky. He strips her in an elevator and they have sex on the side of a sink. It is a burst of passion and of impulse on his behalf, as his “normal life” is cast aside in a moment of heated compulsion. The affair is completely within the realms of understandable action and makes sense in the context of Gallagher’s marriage. One is further compelled to think that Gallagher’s return to his wife and his attempts at being suddenly intimate and physically affectionate come as a way of “making up” the affair to himself and glossing it over with affection for the one he loves.

It is a film that has sparked discussion and delicious debate. Was Glenn Close’s character really all that bad? Were her actions understandable and even worthy of empathy? Was Gallagher all that bad? Is he an innocent man? Was Alex Forest really pregnant? A good film satisfies you, but it leaves room for discussion and debate. Fatal Attraction is a film that had audiences talking long after it was over and provided thrills that remained in the minds of viewers for weeks. It is a classic thriller that provokes, engages and chills with its natural realism, excellent performances and compelling script.

8.5/10

Trailer: